![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
Agreed -- just saw this:SnowFella wrote:woakleysunglasses has been spamming afair few topics through the forum now, might be an idea to polish the old jumpboot on his/her rear end I think.
Yeah, that's emma.mike. The troll I was talking about yesterday, the idiot's signature on his latest post links to something about online loans.Peterthecactusguy wrote:there is a new one in general in a post from 2005.. WTF..
You can have a signature. Only yours have a strange meaning. And not true as far as much I know about suculents and cacti matter.Nkomo-A-Gogo wrote:is it possible to only let a member have a signature after they have had a reasonable amount of posts.
Also have a report as spam function so that if say, 10 members dislike a post for being spam its automatically deleted and the spammer executed.
Probably easier said than done though.
Signatures just by themselves are fine. The offense is when new members use them as links to advertising that has nothing to do with what the forum is generally about. The only way to counter it is report posts by spammers on this thread. As the site admin, Daiv does a really good job with shooting down spammers, but it needs to be a cooperative effort.Nkomo-A-Gogo wrote:is it possible to only let a member have a signature after they have had a reasonable amount of posts.
Also have a report as spam function so that if say, 10 members dislike a post for being spam its automatically deleted and the spammer executed.
Probably easier said than done though.