Melocactus
- gemhunter178
- Posts: 2763
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 6:10 pm
- Location: Massachusetts,USA. Zone 6A
Re: Melocactus
Looks like one, I don't know the species, Melocacti are hard to identify before they grow a cephalium. Even the I can't identify them. actually, Melocatus azureus is easy to identify, but this is certainly not one, unless the second one is bluer than in the picture.
A cactus and succulent collector who especially likes Ariocarpus. …Though I have a bit of everything! Want some pictures? See my flickr! I also do art and such.
- Peterthecactusguy
- Posts: 8862
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:49 am
- Location: Black Canyon City, Arizona
Re: Melocactus
I wanna say that's a Ferocactus.. but I might be wrong...
Here's to you, all you insidious creatures of green..er I mean cacti.
Re: Melocactus
It's not a Melocactus.
I think it's a young Wigginsia(...which then became Notocactus ...which now is called Parodia ).
Or going the other way round it's a Parodia belonging to the Wigginsia "group".
As for the species, it is too young to call but most probable it is a sellowii.
So, to sum it up, I think it's a Parodia sellowii.
They make wonderful flowers, I'm sure you will enjoy it.
I think it's a young Wigginsia(...which then became Notocactus ...which now is called Parodia ).
Or going the other way round it's a Parodia belonging to the Wigginsia "group".
As for the species, it is too young to call but most probable it is a sellowii.
So, to sum it up, I think it's a Parodia sellowii.
They make wonderful flowers, I'm sure you will enjoy it.
Cacti:plants with shape, strength and character.
- CactusBoss
- Posts: 668
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 3:46 am
- Location: Illinois
Re: Melocactus
they're talking about the first plant.CactusBoss wrote:its a Melocactus i can see the cephalium
I also seriousle doubt it's the same species as the melocactus.
Filip
- Steve Johnson
- Posts: 4593
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 4:44 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA (Zone 10b)
Re: Melocactus
Agreed, I wouldn't peg the first one for being a Melocactus -- it doesn't have the right "feel" to me.christos wrote:It's not a Melocactus.
Wigginsia/Notocactus/Parodia? Sometimes I wonder if taxonomists don't have enough time on their hands, so they just like messing around with us!
If you just want photos without all the blather, please visit my Flickr gallery.
My location: Los Angeles, CA (Zone 10b)
My location: Los Angeles, CA (Zone 10b)
- Steve Johnson
- Posts: 4593
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 4:44 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA (Zone 10b)
Re: Melocactus
I wanted to find a photo of it on the Web, but it took some digging around (figuratively)...Cris wrote:the first plant look like my M pescaderensis seedlings
This comes from LA VEGETACION DE SANTANDER “SU LENTO CONOCIMIENTO Y SU ACELERADA PERDIDA”:
The overall form seems to have a definite similarity, although no evidence of spines. I realize that Melos can be tough to identify when they're young, but with the cephalium I'd know for sure. Does your seedling have spines? If so, then either A. it's misidentified, or B. if you're certain that's a Melo pescaderensis, it'll outgrow its spines when it becomes an adult. I've seen spines change with age, but not outgrow them. Then again, my experience is limited at best. If you really do have a Melo, it'll be interesting to see what the plant looks like when it starts growing a cephalium.
If you just want photos without all the blather, please visit my Flickr gallery.
My location: Los Angeles, CA (Zone 10b)
My location: Los Angeles, CA (Zone 10b)
Re: Melocactus
For now the first one doesn't look like Melo to me. But then again... who am I to say???
My thoughts exactly. I asked that a lot of "knowers" but... No answer.Steve Johnson wrote:Wigginsia/Notocactus/Parodia? Sometimes I wonder if taxonomists don't have enough time on their hands, so they just like messing around with us!