Hi
THis one is about 3 ft tall, 2 inches diameter. I assume Cleistocactus. looks sort of like tominensis or morawetzianus in the New Cactus Lexicon. Any thoughts,
thanks MIke
Cleistocactus
Cleistocactus
- Attachments
-
- ds 003.JPG (37.18 KiB) Viewed 1731 times
-
- ds 005.JPG (45.09 KiB) Viewed 1731 times
- Minime8484
- Posts: 1395
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 12:09 am
- Location: Chandler, AZ
Re: Cleistocactus
VERY interesting plant! Definitely a Cleistocactus, but not sure which one. Doesn't look like my C. tominensis for sure (though mine is not yet flowering size).
I'd agree that C. morawetzianus seems closest, but the specimens of that species seem more spined than yours, and the body color of yours seems very distinctive with that blue-gray cast (or is that because of lighting?).
Do you know the provenance of the plant?
I'd be interested on others' opinions on the ID.
Whatever it is, it is a spectacular plant! Very jealous! If you obtained this from a nursery, would love to know where!
I'd agree that C. morawetzianus seems closest, but the specimens of that species seem more spined than yours, and the body color of yours seems very distinctive with that blue-gray cast (or is that because of lighting?).
Do you know the provenance of the plant?
I'd be interested on others' opinions on the ID.
Whatever it is, it is a spectacular plant! Very jealous! If you obtained this from a nursery, would love to know where!
- Minime8484
- Posts: 1395
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 12:09 am
- Location: Chandler, AZ
Re: Cleistocactus
Did just see this, which does seem to fit your plant fairly well:
http://www.cactuspro.com/photos/Cactace ... /4281.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.cactuspro.com/photos/Cactace ... /4281.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Cleistocactus
thanks much,'
I did see that pic, and helped me think of that.
This was a freeby on the table at the club! Of course, most have little interest in these types, especially those that don't make good potted plants. I live in LA, and it is quite possible that this cutting is from the Huntington as sometimes extras are brought in when they cut some down. But I haven't seen C morawetzianus there, tho much is off the paths and unexplored!
Mike
I did see that pic, and helped me think of that.
This was a freeby on the table at the club! Of course, most have little interest in these types, especially those that don't make good potted plants. I live in LA, and it is quite possible that this cutting is from the Huntington as sometimes extras are brought in when they cut some down. But I haven't seen C morawetzianus there, tho much is off the paths and unexplored!
Mike
- Minime8484
- Posts: 1395
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 12:09 am
- Location: Chandler, AZ
Re: Cleistocactus
AHHH!Mike wrote:This was a freeby on the table at the club!
Congrats - You scored HUGE!
They should all be drawn and quartered.Mike wrote:Of course, most have little interest in these types, especially those that don't make good potted plants.
I'll check with John @ the Huntington and see if they have this species!
Re: Cleistocactus
C. morawetzianus is said to have remained the most primitive of the Cleistocactus group still looking more like some of the Cerei and your plant looks like it.
http://www.cacti.co.nz/index.php/libray ... awetzianus" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.cacti.co.nz/index.php/libray ... awetzianus" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Cleistocactus
I checked at HBG, they do have it from Abbey Gardens, but no location listed there. So maybe this is it.
thanks for all the help!
thanks for all the help!