I'm looking for (a) decent book(s) on taxonomy for the smaller opuntiads, i.e.: corynopuntia, cummulopuntia, tunilla, tephrocactus,...
Are there any such (somewhat up to date) books? Or is 'the cactus family' as good/detailed as it gets on these subjects?
small opuntiads taxonomy
small opuntiads taxonomy
Filip
Re: small opuntiads taxonomy
Michael Kiesling's book on Tephrocactus and other Opuntias might be what you want. It is fairly recent although the taxonomy is still changing.
--ian
Re: small opuntiads taxonomy
I've read that one, it's a very interesting book about opuntiads (and their cultivation) indeed, but I found it to be more of an encyclopedia of a certain number of species than something that (tries to) give a clear view on the (to me) 'taxonomic chaos' that is opuntiads. He also mentions in his foreword that he doesn't want to go to far into the subject because 'they are treated in other literature already'.
Thanks for the tip though; I'm probably looking for something that doesn't exist :p
Thanks for the tip though; I'm probably looking for something that doesn't exist :p
Filip
Re: small opuntiads taxonomy
Correct: it doesn't exist 
The best I can do, for the genera I'm more familiar with, is give you a list of species (below). This is based on the New Cactus Lexicon together with last year's Cactaceae Systematics Initiatives 25 which has always acted as a way of publishing new names for the NCL without cluttering up that book's pages. I've added some comments about some of the more confused names, provided I know something about it in the first place!
Austrocylindropuntia
cylindrica
floccosa - most of the hairy plants you see (other than the easily recognisable A. vestita) are this, including a good proportion of those labelled rauhii, lagopa/lagopus. There are hairless forms, too.
lagopus - recently transferred (CSI25) to a new genus as Punotia lagopus. Many of the photos online are wrongly identified floccosa. malyanus is a synonym but photos of this are usually correct.
pachypus
shaferi - don't know much about this one
subulata ssp subulata - the one usually seen
subulata ssp exaltata
verschaffeltii - recently transferred (CSI25) back to Tephrocactus on the basis, I think, of molecular data.
vestita
Cumulopuntia
boliviana - split into 4 subspecies by the NCL: boliviana, dactylifera, echinacea and ignescens. I struggle to understand the differences.
chichensis
corotilla
ignota - I've never come across this plant for real and have seen very few photos, either.
iturbicola - new species (2011) published in CSI25. Like a small boliviana type?
leucophaea - a small-segmented (<3cm) version of sphaerica.
rossiana
sphaerica - a name that was used for lots of different things but has been slimmed down again by the removal of C. leucophaea, zehnderi, corotilla. Most of the things labelled as this are probably leucophaea, unless the segments are more than 4cm long.
subterranea ssp subterranea - previously in Maihueniopsis, Puna, etc. it's back here again!
subterranea ssp pulcherrima - first published as Tephrocactus pulcherrimus in 2000.
zehnderi
Maihueniopsis
archiconoidea
clavarioides
conoidea
darwinii
glochidiata new species (2011) published in CSI25. Like minuta.
glomerata - lots of things have been un-merged from this: darwinii, hickenii, molfinoi, ovata, platyacantha and there may be more to come.
hickenii - like a bigger version of darwinii??
minuta - mandragora probably belongs here.
molfinoi - plants labelled hypogaea belong here.
ovata
platyacantha
subterranea - recently transferred (CSI25) back to Cumulopuntia on the basis of seed and molecular data.
Punotia lagopus - A. lagopus renamed in 2011 (CSI25).
Tephrocactus
alexanderi - includes geometricus
aoracanthus - includes articulatus v. ovatus and v. polyacanthus
articulatus - I've previously given my opinion on all the published varietal names in this thread
bonniae
halophilus - maybe! Vague species perhaps a form of aoracanthus or alexanderi.
molinensis - there are red and grey spined forms.
nigrispinus - an oddball in that it doesn't sit well in any genus, including Tephrocactus.
recurvatus - long known, recently described in 2011 (CSI25)
verschaffeltii - back from Austrocylindropuntia!
weberi - usually white spined but can be brown or somewhere between
Tunilla possibly we should be calling this genus Airampoa - I'm not entirely sure. I share the opinion, expressed by others, that the species names in this genus are meaningless. I keep the names that came with my plants but don't hope to make any more sense of their classification any more.
Hope this is some use.
Tephroweb and Opuntia del sur are both quite good.
The best I can do, for the genera I'm more familiar with, is give you a list of species (below). This is based on the New Cactus Lexicon together with last year's Cactaceae Systematics Initiatives 25 which has always acted as a way of publishing new names for the NCL without cluttering up that book's pages. I've added some comments about some of the more confused names, provided I know something about it in the first place!
Austrocylindropuntia
cylindrica
floccosa - most of the hairy plants you see (other than the easily recognisable A. vestita) are this, including a good proportion of those labelled rauhii, lagopa/lagopus. There are hairless forms, too.
lagopus - recently transferred (CSI25) to a new genus as Punotia lagopus. Many of the photos online are wrongly identified floccosa. malyanus is a synonym but photos of this are usually correct.
pachypus
shaferi - don't know much about this one
subulata ssp subulata - the one usually seen
subulata ssp exaltata
verschaffeltii - recently transferred (CSI25) back to Tephrocactus on the basis, I think, of molecular data.
vestita
Cumulopuntia
boliviana - split into 4 subspecies by the NCL: boliviana, dactylifera, echinacea and ignescens. I struggle to understand the differences.
chichensis
corotilla
ignota - I've never come across this plant for real and have seen very few photos, either.
iturbicola - new species (2011) published in CSI25. Like a small boliviana type?
leucophaea - a small-segmented (<3cm) version of sphaerica.
rossiana
sphaerica - a name that was used for lots of different things but has been slimmed down again by the removal of C. leucophaea, zehnderi, corotilla. Most of the things labelled as this are probably leucophaea, unless the segments are more than 4cm long.
subterranea ssp subterranea - previously in Maihueniopsis, Puna, etc. it's back here again!
subterranea ssp pulcherrima - first published as Tephrocactus pulcherrimus in 2000.
zehnderi
Maihueniopsis
archiconoidea
clavarioides
conoidea
darwinii
glochidiata new species (2011) published in CSI25. Like minuta.
glomerata - lots of things have been un-merged from this: darwinii, hickenii, molfinoi, ovata, platyacantha and there may be more to come.
hickenii - like a bigger version of darwinii??
minuta - mandragora probably belongs here.
molfinoi - plants labelled hypogaea belong here.
ovata
platyacantha
subterranea - recently transferred (CSI25) back to Cumulopuntia on the basis of seed and molecular data.
Punotia lagopus - A. lagopus renamed in 2011 (CSI25).
Tephrocactus
alexanderi - includes geometricus
aoracanthus - includes articulatus v. ovatus and v. polyacanthus
articulatus - I've previously given my opinion on all the published varietal names in this thread
bonniae
halophilus - maybe! Vague species perhaps a form of aoracanthus or alexanderi.
molinensis - there are red and grey spined forms.
nigrispinus - an oddball in that it doesn't sit well in any genus, including Tephrocactus.
recurvatus - long known, recently described in 2011 (CSI25)
verschaffeltii - back from Austrocylindropuntia!
weberi - usually white spined but can be brown or somewhere between
Tunilla possibly we should be calling this genus Airampoa - I'm not entirely sure. I share the opinion, expressed by others, that the species names in this genus are meaningless. I keep the names that came with my plants but don't hope to make any more sense of their classification any more.
Hope this is some use.
Tephroweb and Opuntia del sur are both quite good.
Re: small opuntiads taxonomy
thanks for the post, it contains a lot of information I din't know about yet! It remains as chaotic as it was though, with a few rather dubious species to me...
guess the best option is to get decently documenten plants, so that even if you don't have a correct name, you can tell what sort of plant it is.
Is there any place where those new taxonomic changes get reported so that we, the standard cactus collectors, can follow it?
guess the best option is to get decently documenten plants, so that even if you don't have a correct name, you can tell what sort of plant it is.
Is there any place where those new taxonomic changes get reported so that we, the standard cactus collectors, can follow it?
Filip
Re: small opuntiads taxonomy
What Phil just posted is the best I have seen.
As has been said, the taxonomic waters of the opuntiads is still a roiling, mirky tempest.
To make matters worse we could add the Grusonia, Corynopuntia, Micropuntia, and Maiheniopsis into the mix for sorting out.
At any level, the opuntiads amaze.
As has been said, the taxonomic waters of the opuntiads is still a roiling, mirky tempest.
To make matters worse we could add the Grusonia, Corynopuntia, Micropuntia, and Maiheniopsis into the mix for sorting out.
At any level, the opuntiads amaze.