New plants for picture project
-
- Posts: 2974
- Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:17 am
- Location: SF Bay Area (Zone 9b)
New plants for picture project
Hi I have some new pics for the project. (Daiv, I will email you a bigger one)
An Echinopsis Bridgesi
A Echinopsis Peruviana
A new one here, a Cylindropuntia Acanthocarpa var. Thornberi
Heres another new one. A Echinocereus Hybrid of some sort
An Echinopsis Bridgesi
A Echinopsis Peruviana
A new one here, a Cylindropuntia Acanthocarpa var. Thornberi
Heres another new one. A Echinocereus Hybrid of some sort
Re: New plants for picture project
Echinopsis lageniformis is T. bridgesii. not E. bridgesii.Saguaro123 wrote:Hi I have some new pics for the project. (Daiv, I will email you a bigger one)
An Echinopsis Bridgesi
daiv, i think there are a couple photos on this forum now as well as the nice ones above
also my seed pic found here: http://www.cactiguide.com/cactus/?genus ... s=bridgesi
is of Echinopsis lageniformis/T. bridgesii, though you may want to know.
Stephen Robert Irwin: 22 February 1962 – 4 September 2006. Rest In Peace.
Re: New plants for picture project
Thanks! I think I almost certainly would have made that mistake!Loph wrote: Echinopsis lageniformis is T. bridgesii. not E. bridgesii.
daiv, i think there are a couple photos on this forum now as well as the nice ones above
also my seed pic found here: http://www.cactiguide.com/cactus/?genus ... s=bridgesi
is of Echinopsis lageniformis/T. bridgesii, though you may want to know.
All Cacti are succulents, but not all succulents are Cacti
-
- Posts: 2974
- Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:17 am
- Location: SF Bay Area (Zone 9b)
-
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:00 am
I'd also include a pic of the more popular monstrose form of T.bridgesii/E.lageniformis, the 'penis cactus' in the Guide for id sake.
here's mine:
and IMO the encounterability of E.lageniformis should be 'common locally in some areas' rather than 'rare', its quite common here.
E.bridgesi, however, is a different plant which I am not familiar with.
here's mine:
and IMO the encounterability of E.lageniformis should be 'common locally in some areas' rather than 'rare', its quite common here.
E.bridgesi, however, is a different plant which I am not familiar with.
-
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:00 am
-
- Posts: 2974
- Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:17 am
- Location: SF Bay Area (Zone 9b)
-
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:00 am
-
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:00 am
wait, are we looking for an Echinopsis bridgesii or E.bridgesi? i'm assuming they're the same.
E.bridgesii apparently so:
http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~bunkenba/Cact ... gesii.html
quote from wikipedia 'Echinopsis' entry:
''Most notably, there had previously existed both Echinopsis bridgesii and Trichocereus bridgesii, which are very different plants. Echinopsis bridgesii is a short clumping cactus, whereas Trichocereus bridgesii is a tall columnar cactus similar to E. (or T.) pachanoi. Under the new classification, Trichocereus bridgesii is known as Echinopsis lageniformis.''.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echinopsis
E.bridgesii apparently so:
http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~bunkenba/Cact ... gesii.html
quote from wikipedia 'Echinopsis' entry:
''Most notably, there had previously existed both Echinopsis bridgesii and Trichocereus bridgesii, which are very different plants. Echinopsis bridgesii is a short clumping cactus, whereas Trichocereus bridgesii is a tall columnar cactus similar to E. (or T.) pachanoi. Under the new classification, Trichocereus bridgesii is known as Echinopsis lageniformis.''.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echinopsis
-
- Posts: 2974
- Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:17 am
- Location: SF Bay Area (Zone 9b)