http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/28/10908790-starbucks-draws-flak-over-dye-made-from-bugs
Ummm. Ummm. Yummy!
![]() | ![]() |
Moderator: hob


](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
daiv wrote:Well I guess it would fit there. This doesn't bother me at all. It sure didn't hurt anyone until they knew where it came from.
Just keep eating the Soylent Green and stop asking questions!
majcka wrote:Wasn't Soylent Green a title of movie couple (or maybe more couples) of decades ago? With Charlton Heston?

John C wrote:Interesting, I don't see what the problem is really. You will never be able to please everyone.
Peterthecactusguy wrote:hmm I Am pretty sure we all have had cochineals (or something like that) they use it to dye fruit juices and many other things (red) I think it's Red #40 but I could be wrong on that one.
CelticRose wrote:However, I don't see what all the fuss about Starbucks is about. It's not like they're labeling the drinks as vegetarian. If something's not labeled as vegetarian or vegan then you've got to take your chances or do a little research.

daiv wrote:Rose,
I think you summed up the situation very well - particularly this point:CelticRose wrote:However, I don't see what all the fuss about Starbucks is about. It's not like they're labeling the drinks as vegetarian. If something's not labeled as vegetarian or vegan then you've got to take your chances or do a little research.
Maybe because people didn't envision Starbucks as a company that would promote the mistreatment of mealy bugs and the sudden realization is just too much to bear!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest