ID please
ID please
I bought this cactus in Union Square and over the summer I have watched it grow a little over an inch. I searched unsuccessfully for what kind of cactus it is. I was hoping someone would be able to help me out with this.
- GermanStar
- Posts: 1495
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:07 am
- Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
- Contact:
Deffinatly a euphorbia,
Have a look at this site
http://www.euphorbia.de/jacobsen.htm
Click on the key and start in the O's
Have a look at this site
http://www.euphorbia.de/jacobsen.htm
Click on the key and start in the O's
Forget the dog...Beware of the plants!!!
Tony
Tony
How about Euphorbia sekukuniensis? For comparison, I have posted a photo of my young E. seukuniensis plant below.
“Whenever people say, 'We mustn't be sentimental,' you can take it they are about to do something cruel. And if they add, 'We must be realistic,' they mean they are going to make money out of it.”
― Brigid Brophy
― Brigid Brophy
jmzako, I'm sure it's not E. trigona, which has a different growth pattern.
I think it's E. evansii. That's based on a number of factors: acuteness of the angles (ribs)(E. grandidens usually has chunkier stems), the length of the spines (E. grandidens' are usually shorter), and mottling on the stems, which are slightly twisted (both typical of E. evansii but not E. grandidens). The spine shields of E. grandidens also usually have an extra pair of prickles (miniature spines) and I don't see any in the pics (maybe it's just my bad eyes though!)
The reason I don't think it's E. sekukuniensis is that that species' spine shields very quickly grow together and become continuous, and I would think the plant pictured is large enough to show that characteristic.
I've gone on at length because my confidence level isn't very high -- all three species are very similar, and it could turn out to be any one of them. But E. evansii seems the most likely candidate, both from my reference books and pictures on euphorbia.de and aridlands.com.
-R
I think it's E. evansii. That's based on a number of factors: acuteness of the angles (ribs)(E. grandidens usually has chunkier stems), the length of the spines (E. grandidens' are usually shorter), and mottling on the stems, which are slightly twisted (both typical of E. evansii but not E. grandidens). The spine shields of E. grandidens also usually have an extra pair of prickles (miniature spines) and I don't see any in the pics (maybe it's just my bad eyes though!)
The reason I don't think it's E. sekukuniensis is that that species' spine shields very quickly grow together and become continuous, and I would think the plant pictured is large enough to show that characteristic.
I've gone on at length because my confidence level isn't very high -- all three species are very similar, and it could turn out to be any one of them. But E. evansii seems the most likely candidate, both from my reference books and pictures on euphorbia.de and aridlands.com.
-R