Cactus IDx 2
Cactus IDx 2
Trying to ID these guys!
Re: Cactus IDx 2
Oops- forgot the pictures!
- Attachments
-
- 64053BFE-6BF9-46D1-9F0C-E80BF44FF498.jpeg (96.2 KiB) Viewed 816 times
-
- 5DAF7954-2BF7-4555-ADA4-0D5622EFAE56.jpeg (129.17 KiB) Viewed 816 times
-
- E917C52C-8C69-4A50-9FC6-CEDB518E5A3A.jpeg (91.97 KiB) Viewed 816 times
Re: Cactus IDx 2
3rd. may be Mammillaria microhelia
Re: Cactus IDx 2
First is not a cactus(and please rotate the photos before uploading)-probably a euphorbia horrida(caution-plant has very toxic milky sap ) and is etiolated(dont have euphorbias, so cant tell you how to deal with it)
Second is a pilosocereus gouenelii-reccomend moving to brighter are to avoid further etiolation)
Second is a pilosocereus gouenelii-reccomend moving to brighter are to avoid further etiolation)
- ElieEstephane
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2016 12:10 am
- Location: Lebanon (zone 11a)
Re: Cactus IDx 2
For the last one, mammillaria microhelia is a possibility but Mammillaria pink nymph hybrid is more common.
There are more cacti in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
One of the few cactus lovers in Lebanon (zone 11a)
One of the few cactus lovers in Lebanon (zone 11a)
-
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 4:27 pm
- Location: England
- Contact:
Re: Cactus IDx 2
First one looks like a smaller-stemmed, more clustering Euphorbia than E. horrida, so maybe E. submammillaris.
It needs a lot more light, the thin spindly new growth is not normal. This also makes an id harder.
It needs a lot more light, the thin spindly new growth is not normal. This also makes an id harder.
Re: Cactus IDx 2
Maybe (an etiolated) Euphorbia globosa for #1
Re: Cactus IDx 2
stefan m. wrote:First is not a cactus(and please rotate the photos before uploading)-probably a euphorbia horrida(caution-plant has very toxic milky sap ) and is etiolated(dont have euphorbias, so cant tell you how to deal with it)
Second is a pilosocereus gouenelii-reccomend moving to brighter are to avoid further etiolation)
Stefan m- This is the post you confused me on. Which picture would I have rotated if they are all upright?
Re: Cactus IDx 2
Don't worry, it's just an issue with the forum software.Amym wrote:stefan m. wrote:First is not a cactus(and please rotate the photos before uploading)-probably a euphorbia horrida(caution-plant has very toxic milky sap ) and is etiolated(dont have euphorbias, so cant tell you how to deal with it)
Second is a pilosocereus gouenelii-reccomend moving to brighter are to avoid further etiolation)
Stefan m- This is the post you confused me on. Which picture would I have rotated if they are all upright?
Stefan m: If you right click and view image then it'll show the picture in its correct orientation. The forum is the one that rotated it, seems there's a bug.
Re: Cactus IDx 2
Toadstar - thanks for clearing that up for me!