3 Unlabeled Cacti... Please help identify

[Brommelhorst]

Hello all!!! I was wondering if anyone could help me identify three cacti that were unlabeled at my local nursery. I am new to having cacti and I would really like to know what types these are.

This first cactus is 1 1/4" tall and about 2" in diameter.

RenderedContent-35D72E78-9B5F-4DF4-99A1-F92E2874DC78.JPG (197.67 KiB) Viewed 875 times

RenderedContent-1BE30513-B79E-4523-9C0B-E75245E3AF45.JPG (180.94 KiB) Viewed 875 times

This next one looks very unhealthy, but I am trying to bring it back to life. It's 3 1/2" tall and about 3/4" in diameter.

RenderedContent-1C3FD84B-6F52-4C26-9B3A-E4A0CDEC4A9E.JPG (129.47 KiB) Viewed 875 times

I am pretty sure that this last one is a Golden Barrel Cactus, but I just want to make sure. It is 4" tall and about 3" in diameter.

RenderedContent-483E69F3-73A6-4C28-98F1-C154A17953B9.JPG (185.18 KiB) Viewed 875 times

RenderedContent-4B0DFCDA-2128-46CE-AA88-8BCBF8987A96.JPG (168.49 KiB) Viewed 875 times

Any help is greatly appreciated!

[Kamos]

The third one looks to me like Mammillaria rhodantha, but I'm not sure.

[teo]

#2 - Cylindropuntia fulgida var. mamillata

[Brommelhorst]

The third one looks to me like Mammillaria rhodantha, but I'm not sure.

It's definitely in the Mammilla Genus. I think you're right with Rhodantha too. It's hard to tell though. Thank you very much!!!!

[Brommelhorst]

#2 - Cylindropuntia fulgida var. mamillata

Thank you very much Teo!!! Out of these three I needed identified, this was the hardest for me to even guess at. This cactus has a lot of different growth patterns and it was hard to look through pictures to see what it could be.

[Brommelhorst]

Anyone have any clue on what the first one is?

[teo]

I would guess a Parodia for #1

[mmcavall]

The first one resembles my Parodia conccina, but I'm not sure the spines at correct for this genus.

[mmcavall]

I mean, I'm not sure about the spines just because I don't know anything about spines morphology, but Teo proposed Parodia, so they must be correct and P. Conccina is a good guess