Four more

If you have a cactus plant and need help identifying it, this is the place to post it.
Post Reply
fanaticactus
Posts: 3194
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:44 pm
Location: Grand Isle Co., Vermont

Four more

Post by fanaticactus »

These have been problematic for me for a while. This first one I had thought was either a Mamm.or a Cory. However, it has neither the typical Mamm. wool between tubercles nor the usual shallow 'groove' on the upper side of the tubercle that denotes a Cory. I was flipping through various genera searching for something unexpected yet possible. I'd like to know if this could be an Echinomastus intertextus, whose nickname is a 'Pineapple cactus'. It looks more like these photos and fits the description more closely than anything else I've found. Anderson cites Britton and Rose noting that Echinomastus resembles Coryphanta. It's a slow grower. I've had it for about three years and last year was the first growth it showed, and it was lopsided...as if there had been an injury to the crown, but maybe that's just the way it grows. It's about two inches tall and two and a half inches diameter at the base.
DSC06697.JPG
DSC06697.JPG (149.03 KiB) Viewed 1017 times
DSC06698.JPG
DSC06698.JPG (142.03 KiB) Viewed 1017 times
DSC06699.JPG
DSC06699.JPG (159.51 KiB) Viewed 1017 times
The second one certainly looks to me like a Mamm.--perhaps either a magnifica or a dixanthocentron although the tubercles and areoles look much smaller and numberous on mine. It is about two inches tall and two and a quarter inches wide. If not these, can anyone suggest another possibility?
DSC06700.JPG
DSC06700.JPG (141.17 KiB) Viewed 1017 times
DSC06701.JPG
DSC06701.JPG (160.69 KiB) Viewed 1017 times
DSC06702.JPG
DSC06702.JPG (146.73 KiB) Viewed 1017 times
After several attempts to ID the third one, I believe it is a Peniocereus serpentinus--the former Nyctocereus serpentinus. Can anyone verify?
DSC06703.JPG
DSC06703.JPG (128.77 KiB) Viewed 1017 times
DSC06704.JPG
DSC06704.JPG (139.42 KiB) Viewed 1017 times
DSC06705.JPG
DSC06705.JPG (111.87 KiB) Viewed 1017 times
. The fourth one I had thought was something in the Echinopsis genus, but the more I look at it and see similar pictures in other genera, I'm not so sure. I just bought it in late January. It's about two and a quarter inches tall. Help?
DSC06706.JPG
DSC06706.JPG (134.2 KiB) Viewed 1017 times
DSC06707.JPG
DSC06707.JPG (141.33 KiB) Viewed 1017 times
Catch a falling star--but don't try it with a cactus!
User avatar
7george
Posts: 2645
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:49 pm
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Re: Four more

Post by 7george »

#1 is a Coryphantha for sure, not Echinomastus.

#2 is Mammillaria muehlenpfordtii (celsiana);

#3 - Looks like Cleistocactus, don't know the species at first glance.

#4 - Haageocereus sp. ?
If your cacti mess in your job just forget about the job.
°C = (°F - 32)/1.8
fanaticactus
Posts: 3194
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:44 pm
Location: Grand Isle Co., Vermont

Re: Four more

Post by fanaticactus »

7george wrote:#1 is a Coryphantha for sure, not Echinomastus.
Do you have an idea which species? I've looked at all of them and nothing resembles it.

Thanks for the others. I'll take a closer look.
Catch a falling star--but don't try it with a cactus!
User avatar
7george
Posts: 2645
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:49 pm
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Re: Four more

Post by 7george »

Coryphantha are similar and variable but most likely it is Coryphantha compacta or C. cornifera. Those are often sold in common places. But it is still an young plant and if centrals or flowers appear this may change the ID. You can suspect also others with many pectinate radials, like C. potosiana or C. delicata.
If your cacti mess in your job just forget about the job.
°C = (°F - 32)/1.8
User avatar
Minime8484
Posts: 1395
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 12:09 am
Location: Chandler, AZ

Re: Four more

Post by Minime8484 »

#3 looks like Cleistocactus baumannii.
Post Reply