Echinocereus engelmannii and regional forms
Echinocereus engelmannii and regional forms
I am fascinated by the Echinocereus engelmannii complex and have had the opportunity to photograph almost all of the regional/geographic forms of this complex over the past few years. This group of plants has bedeviled taxonomists for a long time, as one finds out while researching all of the various names that have been published and comparing them with Mesa Garden field numbers, herbarium records and distribution maps, etc. The whole complex has had at least 9 infraspecific taxa described (sometimes at species level, other times at variety or subspecies level): acicularis, fasciculatus, armatus, chrysocentrus, munzii, decumbens, variegatus, llanuraensis, purpureus are some of the names associated with this complex. (I probably missed at least one). In each case, these names were assigned to fairly loosely circumscribed geographical populations.
I have not had a chance to read the original descriptions for all of these names, a project that I am involved in currently, which involves tracking down issues of some very obscure journals such as the Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences from 1926 (munzii), etc. I only really know them from their associated geographical locales. One definitely gets the sense that this is a complex of plants in the process of allopatric speciation, slowly developing very distinctive characters due to geographical boundaries.
I'll post pics of each form with an attempt at an ID. I could be wrong, of course, either because some forms tend to share characteristics or because my own knowledge is somewhat flawed.
No matter one's taxonomic philosophy, it sure is a cool bunch of plants. I find acicularis to be the least interesting, maybe just because it is the most common form in the Phoenix area, where I live. A funny footnote: in putting this post together, I could not find a picture of anything I would just call "engelmannii." I know I have some photos of some of the Baja engelmannii, and those are just standard. But I can't find them.
peterb
I have not had a chance to read the original descriptions for all of these names, a project that I am involved in currently, which involves tracking down issues of some very obscure journals such as the Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences from 1926 (munzii), etc. I only really know them from their associated geographical locales. One definitely gets the sense that this is a complex of plants in the process of allopatric speciation, slowly developing very distinctive characters due to geographical boundaries.
I'll post pics of each form with an attempt at an ID. I could be wrong, of course, either because some forms tend to share characteristics or because my own knowledge is somewhat flawed.
No matter one's taxonomic philosophy, it sure is a cool bunch of plants. I find acicularis to be the least interesting, maybe just because it is the most common form in the Phoenix area, where I live. A funny footnote: in putting this post together, I could not find a picture of anything I would just call "engelmannii." I know I have some photos of some of the Baja engelmannii, and those are just standard. But I can't find them.
peterb
- Attachments
-
- the standard acicularis from the Tempe/Phoenix area and Maricoopa County in general
- acicularis1.jpg (124.67 KiB) Viewed 2201 times
-
- what I am tempted to call acicularis, from near Bouse AZ, much farther west.
- acicularis.jpg (141.61 KiB) Viewed 2201 times
-
- armatus, from Newberry Springs, CA
- armatus.jpg (133.48 KiB) Viewed 2201 times
-
- chrysocentrus from Meadview AZ
- chrysocentrus.jpg (109.47 KiB) Viewed 2201 times
-
- closer view of the salt and pepper style of chrysocentrus from Meadview
- chrysocentrus2.jpg (159.6 KiB) Viewed 2201 times
-
- a form from Death Valley that I thought was munzii but I'm not positive. Still have to find some solid info on munzii.
- munzii.jpg (118.18 KiB) Viewed 2201 times
-
- the dramatic howei, from near Goffs, CA
- howei.jpg (116.79 KiB) Viewed 2201 times
-
- one of the apparently mixed engelmannii/fasciculatus plants from the Florence area. This area seems to be a kind of genetic stew.
- fasciculatus.jpg (112.55 KiB) Viewed 2201 times
-
- variegatus in the House Rock Valley
- variegatus.jpg (122.04 KiB) Viewed 2201 times
-
- Interesting plants from near the Grand Canyon Skywalk, reminiscent of chrysocentrus but not nearly as spiny. Beautiful flowers.
- notsure.jpg (74.9 KiB) Viewed 2201 times
-
- another shot of armatus from southern Ca.
- armatus3.jpg (95.34 KiB) Viewed 2201 times
-
- another shot of howei from near Goffs CA.
- howei4.jpg (106.18 KiB) Viewed 2201 times
Zone 9
Re: Echinocereus engelmannii and regional forms
I like the spiny California forms. I have to remember to get some seed this winter. I don't have howei or armatus.
--ian
- Peterthecactusguy
- Posts: 8862
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:49 am
- Location: Black Canyon City, Arizona
Re: Echinocereus engelmannii and regional forms
all I can say is that you have much more patience then I when it comes to these beautiful spiny plants. I can't ID them for crap however a couple of those forms, while rare are growing around where I live. (E. fascicaulus is growing around here, but for the one I see of that, there are probably 2000 that aren't it and most of them are E. boyce-thompsonii). Anyways interesting study of them, THANKS.
Here's to you, all you insidious creatures of green..er I mean cacti.
Re: Echinocereus engelmannii and regional forms
Yes, I left out boyce-thompsonii because it seems it is considered its own species now, or at least not considered under engelmannii. I forget. I also left out nicholii, as it too is considered its own species. They both were named as varieties of engelmannii at various times, however.
I wonder how I would do in a test, identifying these without any habitat information. Probably not so well. It is particularly the combination of interesting characters and particular geographic locations that make them somewhat easier to identify.
peterb
PS- re: boyce-thompsonii, it looks like it is not mentioned at all in the Flora of North America. At least, I can't find it.
I wonder how I would do in a test, identifying these without any habitat information. Probably not so well. It is particularly the combination of interesting characters and particular geographic locations that make them somewhat easier to identify.
peterb
PS- re: boyce-thompsonii, it looks like it is not mentioned at all in the Flora of North America. At least, I can't find it.
Zone 9
- Peterthecactusguy
- Posts: 8862
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:49 am
- Location: Black Canyon City, Arizona
Re: Echinocereus engelmannii and regional forms
lol PeterB, if you gave me a test on those forms I would fail. I can't tell any of them apart. I consider boyce-thompsonii to be a separate species, same as nicholii and actually I forgot that both of those were under engelmannii at one time. Still a very fascinating subject. I actually wish I knew more about these plants because there are so many around where I live. So north, and some south and a lot around here. I guess I need to travel more in AZ and look at the different populations some.
(edit) looked in SEINet they have it listed as E. fendleri var boyce-thompsonii
(edit) looked in SEINet they have it listed as E. fendleri var boyce-thompsonii
Here's to you, all you insidious creatures of green..er I mean cacti.
Re: Echinocereus engelmannii and regional forms
Nice photos of an intriguing species.
Ever since I obtained and grew E. boyce-thompsonii the lure of this tribe was upon me.
Now I have E. engelmannii fasiculatus, E.e. variegatus, E. nicholii, E. stramineus, plus mixed seedlings.
I wish I could grow E.e. armatus and E. acicularis types, but figured the climate here was too wet and humid so never tried.
Ever since I obtained and grew E. boyce-thompsonii the lure of this tribe was upon me.
Now I have E. engelmannii fasiculatus, E.e. variegatus, E. nicholii, E. stramineus, plus mixed seedlings.
I wish I could grow E.e. armatus and E. acicularis types, but figured the climate here was too wet and humid so never tried.
- Peterthecactusguy
- Posts: 8862
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:49 am
- Location: Black Canyon City, Arizona
Re: Echinocereus engelmannii and regional forms
haha Nice MJpapay you grow more Echinocereus than I do. Of course the E. boyce-thompsonii are all over the place around me, and I have gotten several cuttings, and a rescue.
Here's to you, all you insidious creatures of green..er I mean cacti.
Re: Echinocereus engelmannii and regional forms
My feeling there are only three forms that deserve name recognition.
One is House Rock valley plants. It is a notably smaller form, spines also shorter, and it blooms a smaller plant. It is common further North, I've seen it just outside of Great Basing NP in Utah, and I think Tonopah plants are of the same king, not sure if I remember it right.
One form is South CA plants, big presence at South of Anza Borego SP in CA. They seem having fewer ribs, a bit more space between areoles. Easier to recognize in plumed up state. Large spiny plants, I've seen only yellow spines but I doubt it is persistent. Flowers are a bit lighter shade of pink but not quite like nicholii.
Phoenix area has bunch of engelmannii X fasciculatus plants, looks like a good gene sup - but that is a different category all together. E. apachensis is of this kind.
Everything else I've seen is a bunch of very spiny plants, dark or yellow spined with always white spines in the areole, persistently mixed colors everywhere. There is some spine variation but I'd attribute it to environmental differences. The drier the area the spinier the plants, and in the shade spines are reduced as we know. Sometimes spines are more curly sometimes they are more straight or arching down, usually with lots of variation at the same locality. All those plats when grown in collection are usually look very similar. To make them develop same nice spines they have to be raised slowly, flowering plant from seed will take something like 20 years vs. normal 7 to 10.
Interesting part about E. engelmannii is how common it is in SW US and how uncommon it is in collections worldwide. Very beautiful and very overlooked plant. My guess if it has been a resent discovery every collection would of have it
One is House Rock valley plants. It is a notably smaller form, spines also shorter, and it blooms a smaller plant. It is common further North, I've seen it just outside of Great Basing NP in Utah, and I think Tonopah plants are of the same king, not sure if I remember it right.
One form is South CA plants, big presence at South of Anza Borego SP in CA. They seem having fewer ribs, a bit more space between areoles. Easier to recognize in plumed up state. Large spiny plants, I've seen only yellow spines but I doubt it is persistent. Flowers are a bit lighter shade of pink but not quite like nicholii.
Phoenix area has bunch of engelmannii X fasciculatus plants, looks like a good gene sup - but that is a different category all together. E. apachensis is of this kind.
Everything else I've seen is a bunch of very spiny plants, dark or yellow spined with always white spines in the areole, persistently mixed colors everywhere. There is some spine variation but I'd attribute it to environmental differences. The drier the area the spinier the plants, and in the shade spines are reduced as we know. Sometimes spines are more curly sometimes they are more straight or arching down, usually with lots of variation at the same locality. All those plats when grown in collection are usually look very similar. To make them develop same nice spines they have to be raised slowly, flowering plant from seed will take something like 20 years vs. normal 7 to 10.
Interesting part about E. engelmannii is how common it is in SW US and how uncommon it is in collections worldwide. Very beautiful and very overlooked plant. My guess if it has been a resent discovery every collection would of have it
-
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:41 am
- Location: 40 south 7440 east Kanab, Utah (Johnson Canyon)
Re: Echinocereus engelmannii and regional forms
There are areas on the Beaverdam Slope in extreme southwestern Washington Co., Utah where these plants are very abundant and in an acre or so you could find most of the more spiney forms of various colors shown above. To add to the confusion, there is likely a diploid form in northern Arizona/swUtah that may or may not be the form originally named var. purpurea. The plants in House Rock Valley are similar to those that occur across much of the Arizona Strip and north in to Utah at elevations above 4000ft.. I'm not an Echinocereus taxonomist so I leave these to Marc Baker to work out.
Dean
Dean
Albert Dean Stock,Ph.D.
Re: Echinocereus engelmannii and regional forms
Dean, I didn't know Baker was working on engelmannii. I can totally see why none of the variety/ssp names are currently accepted. The gestalt jumps out at one in the field, but on closer inspection, the details are pretty thin stuff to hang a name on. It is remarkable to encounter these in their extreme forms. They are very convincingly worthy of a special designation. It is also revealing to encounter them in cultivation or in a more blended or confusing population. Then one wants to throw all the names out. haha.
peterb
peterb
Zone 9
- CactusFanDan
- Posts: 2862
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 6:33 pm
- Location: Manchester, England
- Contact:
Re: Echinocereus engelmannii and regional forms
A very nice couple of plants there. You can see why they've been allocated different names in the past. There are certainly distinctions between them all. Very interesting.
You could also pose the question: at what scale does taxonomy become irrelevant? And why isn't this scale the same in all organisms? (obviously owing to practicalities, but it's an interesting thought)
You could also pose the question: at what scale does taxonomy become irrelevant? And why isn't this scale the same in all organisms? (obviously owing to practicalities, but it's an interesting thought)
-
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:41 am
- Location: 40 south 7440 east Kanab, Utah (Johnson Canyon)
Re: Echinocereus engelmannii and regional forms
They certainly are confusing but likely they are very understudied. Most of what FNA represents is the lack of data and the rather extreme views of the most dedicated "lumpers" in the world. The fall back position in taxonomy, when faced with little data, is to simplify the field.
I believe that Marc Baker is still working on E. engelmannii at times. I'll ask him. Lack of any funding for general cactus research is the limiting factor except for retired people (like me).
The many forms and hardiness of E. engelmannii makes it one of the best plants for out door cactus gardens.
Dean
I believe that Marc Baker is still working on E. engelmannii at times. I'll ask him. Lack of any funding for general cactus research is the limiting factor except for retired people (like me).
The many forms and hardiness of E. engelmannii makes it one of the best plants for out door cactus gardens.
Dean
Albert Dean Stock,Ph.D.
Re: Echinocereus engelmannii and regional forms
However one wishes to look at their taxonomic relationships, I hope (as I'm sure do others who enjoy seeing variation) that the populations will be recognized, seed collected and plants made available - and not all forgotten because they carry one name. And, no - I am not suggesting anyone wishes the different populations or spine forms to be forgotten. I do worry that it can happen though. Why I worry about it I don't know.
-
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:41 am
- Location: 40 south 7440 east Kanab, Utah (Johnson Canyon)
Re: Echinocereus engelmannii and regional forms
Peter, that nice plant from the Grand Canyon Skywalk area may not be E. engelmannii. You should have Marc Baker take a look at the photo.
Dean
Dean
Albert Dean Stock,Ph.D.