While looking through every listing for Eriosyce trying to find what one of my plants should be called (didn't have any luck) I came across a few pictures which appear to be misplaced from what I can tell.
1. http://cactiguide.com/cactus/?genus=Eri ... ies=napina" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Peter Royle's picture is E. taltalensis paucicostata instead of E. napina.
2. http://cactiguide.com/cactus/?genus=Eri ... curvispina" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The plant in the following picture appears to be E. occulta: http://cactiguide.com/graphics/e_curvispina_c_600.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
3. http://cactiguide.com/cactus/?genus=Eri ... es=occulta" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This one I'm least confident about, however Suleyman Demir's pictures appear to depict E. taltalensis paucicostata too.
Also, I'll probably have some pictures of adult Eriosyce plants to contribute in the future (ideally ones depicting fruits, flowers and the stem). In the mean time, are pictures of seedlings much use?
A few Eriosyce corrections/comments
- CactusFanDan
- Posts: 2862
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 6:33 pm
- Location: Manchester, England
- Contact:
Re: A few Eriosyce corrections/comments
Thanks will have to work on this shortly...
All Cacti are succulents, but not all succulents are Cacti